Battery NBL-43A2300 Replacement For TP-LINK Cell Phone TP-link Neffos C5s TP704A TP704C C5A TP703A

Find the right battery for TP-link Neffos C5s TP704A TP704C C5A TP703A to solve your power issues. Our TP-LINK NBL-43A2300 batteries are manufactured to precisely fit just as your original battery.

We use the highest quality Li-ion cells and components that are lighter weight, charge faster and last longer.

US TP-LINK battery shop – Tech-Battery.com ! Shopping with us is safe and secure! 100% Guarantee Quality and Fully Test!

TP-LINK NBL-43A2300 Battery For TP-LINK – Battery For TP-LINK Cell Phone Li-ion 2300mAh/8.74WH 3.8V/4.35V. Browse our various categories and find out why we have been the go-to source for our customers.

NBL-43A2300
  • Chemistry: Li-ion
  • Voltage: 2300mAh/8.74WH
  • Capacity: 3.8V/4.35V

Free shipping in most countries. click here to view detailed shipping costs.

We ship to the worldwide,please enquiry shipping & handling if you are out of united states.

What’s the total delivery time? (please use this formula to determine when your order will arrive) total delivery time = packaging time + shipping time.

Replaces the following products:

Fits the following devices:

TP-link Neffos C5s TP704A TP704C C5A TP703A

TP-LINK NBL-43A2300 TP-LINK battery is replacement for TP-link Neffos C5s TP704A TP704C C5A TP703A. The NBL-43A2300 batteries equivalent is guaranteed to meet or exceed TP-LINK original specifications. All TP-LINK NBL-43A2300 Battery are brand new, 1 year Warranty, 100% Guarantee Quality and Fully Test!

We deliver quality TP-LINK Cell Phone extended batteries online. Purchase your TP-LINK Cell Phone battery here.

TP-LINK NBL-43A2300 TP-LINK Batteries

  • 100% OEM Compatible with your TP-LINK Cell Phone.
  • Lithium Ion battery technology
  • Convenient and secure online purchasing
  • Dependable high quality TP-LINK batteries
  • Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back
  • 1 Year Warranty on all TP-LINK Cell Phone Replacement Batteries

6 tips to increase NBL-43A2300 TP-LINK Battery lifetime

The performance of your TP-LINK depends largely on the performance of your battery. And his time of life depends on its users, and that you are. These are the principles that have guided the TP-LINK , at the head, so you can optimize the performance of TP-LINK Cell Phone battery.
New battery still fully charged NBL-43A2300 sold. You must be on the first wheel to be conditioned for optimum performance. Loading and unloading of the battery 4 or 5 times is enough to determine.
The memory effect completely to avoid a full charge and discharge the battery, TP-LINK NBL-43A2300 twice a month.
The dirt on the TP-LINK NBL-43A2300 contacts of the battery can power the TP-LINK Cell Phone batteries. Clean with alcohol and cotton can look like and function like new.
This method is recommended for those using the AC adapter for long periods. We recommend that you use the TP-LINK NBL-43A2300 battery at least once in two weeks. Batteries lose its charge when stored for a long time and you need the battery if it does break.
If he does not use a length of time, the TP-LINK NBL-43A2300 battery will be stored protected from a clean, dry and cool, heat and other metals. A loss of business to charge the battery in time and need a break before reuse.
Power Management Features Battery NBL-43A2300 enable the conservation of energy in the battery of TP-LINK Cell Phone. You can control the speed of the processor off, or you can adjust the brightness of the LCD screen to a minimum to ensure low power consumption. 

Why we have been the go-to source for our customers ?

We stock a wide range of rechargeable batteries for TP-LINK Cell Phone. Your TP-LINK Tablet PC is part of your everyday life. Successful communications on a TP-LINK begin with your battery. When purchasing a replacement battery for your TP-LINK TP-LINK, dependability and price are what we have to offer. We’ve been supplying reliable, high quality TP-LINK batteries for over 10 years. Our goal is to provide high quality aftermarket replacement batteries at a very reasonable price. All of our rechargeable Li-Ion TP-LINK batteries are backed by a one year warranty.

What is the run time of TP-LINK battery?

TP-LINK batteries have two main ratings on them: Volts and Amperes. Because size and weight of batteries is limited when compared to larger batteries such as car batteries, most companies show their ratings with Volts and Milliamperes. One thousand Milliamperes equals 1 Ampere. When buying a battery, select batteries with the most Milliamperes (or mAh). Batteries are also rated by Watt-Hours, perhaps the simplest rating of all. This is found by multiplying the Volts and the Amperes together. For example:

  • 14.4 Volts, 4000mAh (Note: 4000mAh is equal to 4.0 Amperes).
  • 14.4 x 4.0 = 57.60 Watt-Hours

Watt-Hours signifies the energy needed to power one watt for one hour.

Olympus launches a new Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera

Olympus has made its new Micro Four Thirds digital camera official. The OM-D E-M5 Mark III is pitched as a particularly compact mirrorless camera with lots of functions and abilities. In addition to its updated 20.4MP Live MOS sensor, it also has a 2.36 million dot electronic viewfinder – which is also OLED – as well as a 3.0-inch Vari-Angle Touchscreen – which is not.

The OM-D E-M5 Mark III also packs in-body 5-axis image stabilization. It is rated for DCI and UHD 4K video, recording at 30 frames per second (fps). However, it also has a mechanical shutter that can achieve 10 fps for up to 150 consecutive raw files. It can also produce time-lapses of 5fps.

This new Micro Four Thirds unit also has an ISO range of 200 to 25600, as well as 121-point phase-detect chip-linked autofocus (AF). The E-M5 Mark III’s AF can also be adjusted manually to suit focus ranges and points. This new Olympus mirrorless camera is to be made available on B&H Photo Video soon. It will come in black or silver colorways for a price of US$1199.

Nikon Z6 vs Nikon Z50: 10 key differences you need to know

With Nikon introducing a brand new APS-C (DX format) Z series camera into the mix, it begs the question: do you need to buy the more expensive full-frame Z6 mirrorless camera?

Both are designed to be great all-rounders, but that extra real estate for the Z6 image sensor sees an asking price of more than double that of the Z50’s. If you’re a travel photographer, there’s also the fact that the Z6 is bigger, heavier and bulkier too. 

In this comparison we’ll discover the key differences between the two cameras to help you decide whether you should splash the cash or save the pennies. 

Nikon Z50 vs Nikon Z6: Sensor and resolution 

Of course, the biggest difference between these two cameras is the sensor size. The Z6 totes a 24.5 megapixel full-frame (what Nikon calls FX format), while the Z50 has a smaller APS-C (DX format) 20.9 megapixel sensor. Despite it being the same resolution as the Nikon D500 sensor, Nikon claims the Z50 is not the mirrorless equivalent of the DSLR. 

A full-frame sensor is generally better in low light, while the higher resolution should mean it’s also better suited to capturing fine details as well. Whether you need the larger sensor very much depends on what you like to shoot. If you’re consistently shooting in gloomy conditions, the Z6 will undoubtedly perform better but if, on the whole, you’re shooting in favorable conditions (such as while traveling), then the Z50 should be more than adequate.

Nikon Z50 vs Nikon Z6: Lenses

Both the Nikon Z50 and the Z6 use the same Z lens mount. That means that all of the existing Z mount lenses available for the Z6 and the Z7 can be used with the Z50. As the sensor is smaller, you’ll need to take into account the crop factor – so the 35mm f/1.8 S series lens would offer an equivalent focal length of around 52mm. 

Additionally, two new Z mount lenses have been announced for pairing with the Z50, specifically designed for use with the smaller sensor. These are a 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 kit lens, and a 50-250mm f/4.5-6.3 telephoto zoom. The former is designed to keep the overall system as compact as possible and, again, is great for those looking for a travel-friendly snapper.

Nikon published a lens road map recently which showed that there will be more lenses announced throughout 2020 and 2021 designed for both its mirrorless systems.

Nikon Z50 vs Nikon Z6: LCD screen

Here’s a good example of another reasonably big difference between the two models. 

While both have a 3.2-inch LCD screen, the Z6 has a higher, 2100K-dot resolution display as compared to the 1040K-dot resolution on the Z50. Used in isolation you may not realize what you’re missing out on, though. 

The Z50 also has an extra trick up its sleeve – it can tilt to face all the way forwards, which is great for selfies and for recording vlogs to camera. The Z6’s screen can tilt, but only downwards and slightly upwards. 

Nikon Z50 vs Nikon Z6: EVF

Both cameras have electronic viewfinders, but the EVF on the Z6 – which is the more expensive of the two shooters – is both higher in resolution and size. 

The Z50’s EVF is a 2360k-dot, 0.39-inch device, compared to the Z6’s 3690k-dot 0.5-inch option. Again, it’s likely that if you only ever use the smaller, lower resolution EVF of the Z50 you won’t know what you’re missing out on. 

Nikon Z50 vs Nikon Z6: Burst shooting

Here’s another point where the Z6 and Z50 are reasonably similar: the Z6 offers 12fps shooting, while the Z50 sits only slightly behind at 11fps, with both speeds sufficient for shooting sports and action. In fact, you might argue that with the crop sensor, and the longer lens available for it (for now), the Z50 is the best option out of the two. 

Nikon Z50 vs Nikon Z6: Memory card 

The Z6 uses a single XQD card, while the Z50 has a single SD card slot. Although XQD cards are faster and more robust, they’re also significantly more expensive and less easy to find than SD cards. 

If you’re already shooting with another camera, you might already have an existing supply of SD cards available to shoot with. As the physical size of an SD card is also smaller, it helps to keep the overall size of the Z50 to a minimum. 

Nikon Z50 vs Nikon Z6: Battery life 

Another specification which helps to save space – the Z50 uses a much smaller battery than the Z6. 

The official CIPA rating for the new EN-EL25 Z50 battery has yet to be announced, but it’s bound to be less than the Z6. That said, with a lower resolution sensor, plus a lower resolution screen and viewfinder, overall power consumption is likely to be lower.

As for the Z6, its EN-EL15b battery life is officially rated at a meager-sounding 310 shots – but in real-world usage you can usually get much more from it, typically lasting at least a whole day for the average user.

Nikon Z50 vs Nikon Z6: Dimensions and weight

Here’s where the Z50 has a trump card if your ultimate concern is portability. 

Weighing in at just 450g (including battery and memory card), it’s over 200g lighter than the 675g Z6. On top of that, the 24-70mm f/4 lens for the Z6 will add another 500g to your kit bag, while the 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 kit lens for the Z50 is only 135g. 

As for dimensions, the Z50 is essentially a miniaturized Z6. It retains a deep grip and decent handling while only being 126.5 x 93.5 x 60mm, as compared to the Z6’s dimensions of 134 x 100.5 x 67.5mm. 

It could be that you prefer the beefier, bulkier Z6 in terms of handling, but it’s hard to deny the Z50’s appeal as a travel-friendly camera.

Nikon Z50 vs Nikon Z6: Price

So here’s the big one – price. Both are excellent cameras, but if you’re on a tight budget, the Z50 offers fantastic value for money. 

At the time of writing, it retails for around $856 / £849 body only (you’ll only get the kit bundles in Australia), or $996 / £989 / AU$1,799 with the 16-50mm kit lens. You’ll need to double your investment if you’re keen on the Z6, which will set you back around $1,996 / £1,699 / AU$2,999 body only, or $2,596 / £2,249 / AU$3,999 with the 24-70mm f/4 lens.

Nikon Z50 vs Nikon Z6: Conclusion

There’s a lot to like about both the Z6 and the Z50. We’re yet to fully test the Z50, but our initial impressions are very good. By now, the Z6 is more of a known quantity, and we’ve been very pleased with how it performs. 

We’d happily recommend the Z6 as a travel-friendly camera – it is still small when compared to equivalent DSLRs. If you want the best image quality, then it makes more sense to go for the full-frame option and, of course, it’s cheaper than it’s higher resolution Z7 sibling. 

However, if your key desire is to have something small, lightweight and a fantastic all-rounder, the Z50 probably makes more sense, especially if you’ll mainly be shooting in good light.

Pixel 4 turns up the heat on other Android phones, and not because of the camera

With the blink of an eye, Google’s Pixel 4 accomplishes something that no other significant Android phone-maker has. It finally caught up to iPhone’s Face ID — a biometric unlocking feature that Apple popularized two years ago — to unlock the phone and buy things with a scan of your face. Now that a secure version exists in Android phones, face unlock will be the killer feature every Android user will want. 

The face unlock feature on Android phones has existed for years, but mostly as a convenience that’s been flimsy enough to fool with photos. Face ID’s more rigorous process meant it was secure enough for transactions. 

Some Huawei phones, like the Huawei Mate 30 Pro, use the same technology as Apple to unlock the phone, but they don’t support mobile payments. This year, Samsung killed its iris scanning after three years. That left Apple as the only real game in town.

With consumers more aware of the value of their privacy, being able to offer secure face unlock is potentially even more convenient than scanning your fingerprint or entering a pin code. Closing the gap with Face ID also gives Google an edge over Samsung, LG, Huawei and all the rest at a time when Google can sell its phones across all major US carriers, providing an opportunity to make the Pixel, which hasn’t historically sold well, more of a household name.

But more importantly, the Pixel 4’s adoption of this secure version of face unlock could have ripple effects throughout the rest of the Android world. If Google folds the blueprint for this secure version of face unlock into the Android OS, it will all but guarantee that every midrange and premium phone will use the feature, since roughly 90% of all smartphones run on the platform. 

Why face unlock matters

Face scanning, along with fingerprint scanning, is one of the few biometrically secure methods of verifying your identity. On a phone, it’s meant to be a fast, convenient and mostly hands-free alternative to fingerprint readers. Using face unlock instead of a fingerprint reader can free up space on the screen and keep you from fumbling on the back or side of the phone to unlock it.

Proponents of face unlock also claim that it’s more secure than fingerprint readers and harder to fool with images and synthetic appendages, like dummy fingers. It has the power to authenticate password autofill in addition to mobile payments.

The technology works by scanning your features and creating a stored image that the phone then compares to your face whenever you attempt to unlock your device. Versions that are less secure create optical images with the camera, which are easy enough to fool with photos, masks or other spoofs. 

Apple, and now Google, uses an infrared sensor to project tens of thousands of dots onto your face. This creates a 3D depth map with far more data on the length, shape, span and width of your unique features.

While the iPhone requires you to swipe up from the bottom of the screen to finish unlocking the phone (after it’s verified your identity), the Pixel 4 uses Motion Sense, a collection of motion-sensing features that are driven by radar to recognize when you’re reaching for your device. That alone will trigger the Pixel 4 to unlock the screen. 

Using gestures and a glance to unlock the phone should be faster than swiping it — at least, according to Google. This is something we’ll test soon.

Why only now?

It isn’t clear why the Android competition has lagged so far behind when it comes to truly secure face unlock. Qualcomm bundled support for a 50,000-dot projector into its Snapdragon 845 chipset a year after the iPhone X launched in 2017, but rivals were slow to take up the technology.

Perhaps some of these device-makers lacked the technology or software teams to get the feature secure enough, or perhaps they wanted to put their own spin on the secure face unlock realm, as Google has now done.

Either way, Google’s opportunity to innovate on hardware by pairing Motion Sense gestures to the face unlock mechanism isn’t just a long-overdue way for the brand to flex its technical muscle. And it isn’t just a way for Pixel phones to race ahead. Because of Google’s considerable resources and reach, its blueprint for face unlock on Android phones has the potential to push biometrics even further into the future.

LG Stylo 5+ goes on sale at AT&T with upgraded front-facing camera

If you’re on the lookout for a stylus-toting smartphone, the Galaxy Note series has traditionally been your only option. Unfortunately, these cost a pretty penny (except for the Note 3 Neo which Samsung sold for a hot minute), so customers on a budget were left out. LG has targetted the Note customer on a budget with the LG Stylo 5, and AT&T just announced its own variant, the Stylo 5+.

While the Stylo 5+ is technically an upgrade to the Stylo 5 (which Corbin reviewed), it makes the OnePlus 7T Pro seem like a significant update over the 7 Pro. I pored over the specs and there only seem to be two changes when compared to the Stylo 5 — it’s a bit chunkier (6.33″ x 3.09″ x 0.34″ compared to 6.30″ x 3.06″ x 0.33″) and has an upgraded 8MP front-facing camera (up from 5MP).

This 6.2-inch 1080p “phablet” (do we still say that?) is powered by a crusty Snapdragon 450 processor and runs Android 9.0 Pie. Thankfully, it has a decently-sized 3500mAh battery that charges over USB-C.

The Stylo 5+ is now available online and offline through AT&T at a price of $300 — a $50-$80 premium over the regular Stylo 5. However, this can be paid over the span of 30 months interest-free if need be.

New Surface Leak Reveals Powerful Predictive Feature

Following a successful launch of its new Windows 10 Surface hardware for this holiday season, and a promising announcement of the dual screened Surface Neo and Surface Duo, Microsoft is looking at a busy year of testing, developing, and debugging on the Neo and Duo ahead of next year’s launch.

Being smaller mobile devices designed for an all-day experience, battery life is going to be a critical part of that feedback process. And recently published details suggest that Microsoft is working on a system to provide more information to users and the OS to help reduce worries about battery life and endurance.

The details come courtesy of a patent, titled “Power Management Of A Mobile Communications Device” looks at a more accurate way to measure the demand that will be placed on a battery by an app or feature, measuring the power left in the cell, and feeding data back to the user to help them make more informed decisions about their battery. Mayank Parmar reports:

Microsoft surprised everyone by announcing that it’s returning to the smartphone market with Surface Duo. Microsoft has prototyped a dual-screened Android device, which is a bold move that could shake up the smartphone industry.

A patent suggests that Microsoft’s Surface Duo, which is a pocket-sized foldable device that is based on Android, might come with an accurate battery life meter.

Of course mobile devices also covers the vast majority of Microsoft’s Windows 10 powered Surface devices, all of which are looking to maximise battery life, but a look through the images and descriptions in the patent show a focus on smaller devices.

The obvious inference is that Microsoft’s Surface Duo is going to be one of the chief beneficiaries of this technology. Android-powered devices, from tiny smartphones to huge tablets, work hard to keep power consumption low and to keep the user in control through ‘low power modes’ and feeding back information on what applications are using up the most power.

The proposed system here increases the potential for feedback, with the code able to predict the impact on battery life (and therefore device endurance) of individual apps and hardware features if they were to be used.

Perfecting this system, with lots of feedback from devices ‘in the wild’ (perhaps through units supplied to developers and partners for testing) could well be another reason why the Surface Duo was announced a year before it goes on sale in late 2020.

Nokia 6.2 goes up for pre-order in the US with reasonable price and respectable specs

According to Nokia’s official US website, there are no less than 13 smartphones from the early 2017-revived brand available stateside at very reasonable prices ranging from $40 to $450. But you can actually add one more name to that already extensive list, as the Nokia 6.2 seems to have discreetly gone up for pre-order on Amazon at some point this week.

Formally unveiled at the IFA trade show in Berlin last month, the 6.3-inch mid-ranger was expected to cost as little as 200 bucks when it eventually came to the US. Ultimately, exclusive global brand licensee HMD Global appears to have settled on a slightly higher $249 price point, with black and “Ice Blue” hues currently available ahead of an October 28 release with 64 gigs of storage space on deck.

As the name suggests, this comes with a number of downgrades over the specifications of the $350 Nokia 7.2, including a humbler Snapdragon 636 processor (compared to the 660 silicon powering the costlier handset), a modest-sounding 8MP selfie shooter (versus a 20MP camera on the front of the 7.2), and a triple rear-facing lens system consisting of 16, 8, and 5MP imaging sensors (compared to a 48 + 8 + 5MP setup).

Then again, the Nokia 6.2 and 7.2 also have quite a lot in common, starting with the same exact IPS LCD panel sporting a resolution of 2280 x 1080 pixels, as well as a sleek notch and relatively small chin, and including a 3,500mAh battery, 4GB RAM count, and of course, a clean Android One software experience too with an Android 10 update right around the corner.

If you’re not necessarily a hardcore Nokia fan, we should probably point out the 6.2 is entering a price bracket mainly dominated by the likes of the Moto G7 and G7 Power. 

HMD’s newest mid-range soldier packs a slightly faster chipset than its key rivals, as well as a larger battery than the “regular” G7 variant and more memory than the $250 G7 Power. The Nokia 6.2 also has a more complex camera system, at least on paper. Before pulling the trigger, you might want to keep in mind the GSM unlocked phone is exclusively compatible with carriers like AT&T and T-Mobile, lacking support for Sprint and Verizon.

HUAWEI NOVA 5T LAUNCHED IN FRANCE: IT’S THE SAME HONOR 20

Today, Android Authority reported that Huawei launched the Nova 5T in Paris, France. Particularly, this new model is aimed at the European market. So we should expect it to appear in other markets as well. But this is not anything new. The Huawei Nova 5T is an overseas (renamed) version of the Honor 20.

So we can even don’t take a look at the key features of the Nova 5T because we know them from the Honor 20. Say, in terms of configuration, the phone uses a 6.26-inch screen with a punch-hole design. The screen ratio is 91.67% and the resolution is 2340×1080. In terms of hardware, it adopts the Kirin 980 processor, 6GB memory, and 128GB storage space. The battery has a 3750mAh capacity, and it supports a 22.5W fast charge. Interestingly, there is no 3.5mm headphone jack. The phone dimensions are 154.25 x 73.97 x 7.87mm and the weight is 174g. In fact, regardless of its big size, this phone is lightweight.

One of the biggest highlights of the Huawei Nova 5T is the rear quad-camera. It consists of a 48MP main lens (Sony IMX586 sensor), a 16MP super-wide-angle lens (117 degrees), a 2MP depth of field lens, and a 2MP macro lens. On the opposite side, we can find a 32MP selfie shooter.

Moreover, the Nova 5T runs on the EMUI9 based on Android 9. Huawei officially said that the machine can support the complete GMS service.

In terms of color options, the Huawei Nova 5T has three variants of blue, purple, and black. And the European price is 399 pounds. It will go on sale in November.

Canon is Working on a 5D Mark V, May Arrive at the End of 2020: Report

If you’re worried that the launch of the EOS R and the creation of the RF mount meant Canon is giving up on its DSLRs entirely, we have some good news for you: it seems Canon is still planning to keep updating its DLSR lineup… for now.

A source who is familiar with the latest internal Canon camera roadmap tells Canon Rumors that there is in fact a Canon 5D Mark V in the works, in addition to the expected EOS R Mark II.

The source didn’t reveal any timing or other details, but it’s likely these cameras will share a sensor and many of the same specs. Early adopters of Canon’s full-frame mirrorless RF mount will be able to step up to the EOS R Mark II, while full-frame DSLR users who don’t want to give up their OVF or use an adapter with their EF-mount glass will get at least one more 5D upgrade.

Don’t get excited just yet though: CR doesn’t expect either camera to be officially announced until Q4 of 2020.

The Mi Surface is Xiaomi’s new 34-inch gaming-grade monitor

Xiaomi has teased its new monitor, known as the Mi Surface, on its official Weibo account. With its AMD FreeSync support, it seems distinctly directed at the gaming market. Besides this, it also has a 1500R curvature for immersive screen use. 

The Mi Surface is 34 inches in diagonal length, and has a cinematic 21:9 aspect ratio. Xiaomi claims that it covers 121% of the sRGB color gamut. Its refresh rate is 144 hertz (Hz), which may be a little underwhelming in 2019. This monitor has a resolution of 3440×1440.

It will go up for its first round of pre-orders on October 21, 2019 in China. It may be a competitive new entrant in its market on this date, as it will be priced at 1999 yuan (~US$282). Xiaomi may hope it will give buyers in that price range an edge in their first-person shooting titles.