{"id":2888,"date":"2020-11-17T06:43:56","date_gmt":"2020-11-17T06:43:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/?p=2888"},"modified":"2020-11-17T06:43:56","modified_gmt":"2020-11-17T06:43:56","slug":"snapdragon-875-single-core-multi-core-score-leak-shows-it-lags-far-behind-apples-a14-bionic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/snapdragon-875-single-core-multi-core-score-leak-shows-it-lags-far-behind-apples-a14-bionic\/","title":{"rendered":"Snapdragon 875 Single-Core, Multi-Core Score Leak Shows It Lags Far Behind Apple\u2019s A14 Bionic"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>We\u2019re in the last quarter of 2020, and that only means we\u2019ll be greeted with the unveiling of the Snapdragon 875 that\u2019s expected to&nbsp;take place on December 1. However, before that day arrives, we\u2019ll certainly have our fair share of benchmarks, and on this occasion, we get to see how the Snapdragon 875 performs in both single-core and multi-core. In one way, it\u2019s faster than both the&nbsp;Snapdragon 865&nbsp;and&nbsp;Snapdragon 865 Plus. In other ways, there\u2019s no competition for the&nbsp;A14 Bionic&nbsp;right now.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In Fact, the Snapdragon 875 Scores Less Than the Snapdragon 865 Plus in the Multi-Core Results<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Some performance numbers have been shared by TechDroider, who claims that they belong to the upcoming OnePlus 9. As you can see in the image below, the term \u2018Lahaina\u2019 is spotted, which is supposedly the codename for the Snapdragon 875. According to a previous rumor, there are expected to be&nbsp;two versions&nbsp;of Qualcomm\u2019s upcoming SoC, with the slightly more powerful variant codenamed \u2018Lahaina+,\u2019 suggesting that this will be the Snapdragon 875 Plus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Coming to the benchmarks, it appears that Qualcomm had an opportunity to beat Apple\u2019s A14 Bionic, and it wasn\u2019t able to capitalize it with the Snapdragon 875. If you take a look at the scores below, the chipset can beat the Snapdragon 865 Plus in single-core scores, but surprisingly cannot outperform it in the multi-core results, at least according to the&nbsp;Geekbench 5 charts. This can mean that either the OnePlus 9 is an engineering sample and some tweaks will be required, or Qualcomm wants to focus on power-efficiency rather than raw performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These results are astounding, to say the least, because an earlier Snapdragon 875 benchmark leak showed the upcoming SoC was&nbsp;38 percent faster&nbsp;than the Snapdragon 865 Plus, which was an impressive gain. In short, these results disappointed us considerably, but that doesn\u2019t mean we should drown our hopes for 2021. Since Qualcomm&#8217;s official announcement hasn\u2019t kicked off, we\u2019ll advise you to treat these numbers with a pinch of salt, and we\u2019ll be back with more details.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We\u2019re in the last quarter of 2020, and that only means we\u2019ll be greeted with the unveiling of the Snapdragon 875 that\u2019s expected to&nbsp;take place on December 1. However, before that day arrives, we\u2019ll certainly have our fair share of benchmarks, and on this occasion, we get to see how the Snapdragon 875 performs in &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/snapdragon-875-single-core-multi-core-score-leak-shows-it-lags-far-behind-apples-a14-bionic\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Snapdragon 875 Single-Core, Multi-Core Score Leak Shows It Lags Far Behind Apple\u2019s A14 Bionic&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[2180],"class_list":["post-2888","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hardware","tag-snapdragon-875-single-core"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2888"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2888\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2889,"href":"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2888\/revisions\/2889"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tech-battery.com\/batteriesblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}